Auto Blogs | Car Forums

Autotropolis.com Interactive Auto Community
Welcome to Auto Blogs | Car Forums Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

New Car Reviews

  • Sneak Peek: 2009 Nissan 370Z

       

    Nissan recently showed the first official images of its 2009 370Z sports coupe. Building off the heritage from the original 240Z in 1970, the new Z carries a sleek, sporty design as well as replacing the aged 350Z powerplant with a bigger, more powerful engine. The new look and increased power should help make the 370Z a more refined sports car and help eliminate the stigma of being the “poor man’s Corvette”.

    The 2009 Nissan 370Z is the latest addition to the infamous Z car heritage and the new design gives a noticeable nod back to the original. While the 350Z was an eye-catching design when the car launched in 2003, the 370Z actually makes the current design look a bit conservative. The new car’s proportions are more in line with the 240Z with a long hood and swept windshield, while the roofline is almost straight from the A-pillar back to the rear fascia. Short overhangs and prominent wheel arches help increase the 370Z’s sporty stance. The wheel arches are even more prominent compared to its predecessor with headlight and taillight designs in line with the design language of the 2009 Nissan Altima.

    Inside, the 370Z continues its improved sporty makeover. The most appreciated change inside the 370Z is the new steering wheel. While the 350Z used a three-spoke steering wheel that was seemingly pulled out of a Pathfinder, the 370Z’s wheel is sportier and more rounded helping to give the new cabin a look deserving of a sports car. Like the previous Z car, three gauges still sit atop the center stack above a supersized navigation screen.

    Under the hood, the 370Z will use the same engine Infiniti uses in its G37 coupe. No specific details are available on the new Z car, but the G37 puts out 330 horsepower and 270 lb-ft of torque. Like the current 350Z, expect the new car to offer sporty options for both manual and automatic transmission. Power will continue to lay rubber via the rear wheels.

    The 2009 Nissan 370Z will make its official debut at the Los Angeles International Auto Show on Nov. 19, 2008 and will go on sale early in 2009. Stay tuned as we’ll provide more information as it’s released.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos courtesy of Nissan Motors

  • The Chrysler Tug of War - GM vs. Nissan

    By now, the bleeding that is going on at Chrysler has attracted many sharks. The two biggest reports currently involve either General Motors or Nissan consuming the privately held automotive company in the near future – near enough that Chrysler has essentially stopped development of a latest and greatest replacement for the aging V-6 engine lineup. With Nissan and GM circling the SUV and truck-heavy brand, exactly which scenario would play out best for all parties involved as well as the local job markets employed by the companies? Ironically, both situations would mark a reunion of sorts for Jeep to past owners, but here’s our take on both situations:


    The most prominent story right now is of a GM acquisition. Not only would this be devastating for Chrysler, but it a huge mark in the win column for the General being able to take out a major competitor. A major disadvantage for both GM and Chrysler in this situation would be the high amount of plant closures and job loss, not only in the United States but worldwide. Most likely, the Dodge and Chrysler brands would meet the same fate as Plymouth did in 2001, leaving Jeep somewhere along the lines of a booster to the HUMMER brand. This would mark the first time that HUMMER (or more so, its heritage from AM General) and Jeep have been under the same roof since 1983. Although most of Chrysler’s unit sales would be shed, the remaining additional sales could help GM take a big enough lead ahead of Toyota for top manufacturer in the world.


    If Nissan were to acquire Chrysler, this could be looked at more as a merger than an acquisition. This would be the best possible scenario for all parties. Shedding overlapping models is still a definite concern for Chrysler’s three brands, but platform sharing with Nissan could bring Chrysler smaller, fuel-efficient cars, while Nissan would benefit from the truck and SUV platforms as well as the hybrid technology that Chrysler has already invested in. Currently, Nissan’s only hybrid vehicle is the limited production Nissan Altima that uses technology borrowed from rival Toyota. With the advanced technology behind the Chrysler-GM-BMW-Daimler two-mode hybrid system, Nissan could become the leading Japanese manufacturer

    Currently, Nissan is the seventh-ranked automotive manufacturer in the world and a merger of this magnitude would dramatically increase Nissan’s annual sales numbers. Although a few models would undoubtedly be shed in this arrangement, Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep would continue to exist and could help put Nissan Motors in the fifth position (according to 2007 sales statistics) worldwide among automakers. If Chrysler were to become a Nissan subsidiary, it would put Jeep back in the same parts bin as Renault for the first time since Chrysler bought the Jeep brand from AMC in 1987.

    In the end, we think the best chance for success might be with Nissan-Renault, but in this economic environment, GM may have considerably more pull. And when it comes to a tug-of-war, you always want to have more pull.

  • 2008 Volvo XC70 Review | New Volvo Reviews | Volvo Crossover Review

    In a market cluttered with minivans, crossovers and SUVs, Volvo hopes its station wagon heritage will prevail with the latest version of the rugged XC70 crossover. With a powerful engine and stable all-wheel drive system, the Volvo XC70 easily powers through just about anything Mother Nature can put in front of it. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2008 Volvo XC70.

       

    As northerners prepare for the wintry weather ahead, those in the south are still recovering from a brutal hurricane and rain season. While all-wheel drive vehicles have a large following in the northern states for navigating snowdrifts and ice-covered roads, their added traction is beneficial in mud, sand and water, too.

    For this reason, Volvo introduced the third generation of its off-roading station wagon, the 2008 XC70 crossover. While most crossovers use an SUV-like design on top of a car-based chassis, the XC70 reverses that thinking and uses a body almost identical to the V70 wagon, focusing on suspension and drivetrain enhancements to create a more rugged and versatile vehicle. 

    With 8.3 inches of ground clearance, the XC70 sits higher than a Honda Pilot or Toyota Highlander despite giving up at least six inches in overall height to both vehicles. While the Haldex all-wheel drive system lacks a true locking differential and most likely won’t be confused for a full four-wheel drive system, the XC70 is more than capable of getting itself into and out of low-traction situations. The standard hill descent control uses the brakes and engine torque to help keep Volvo’s crossover wagon from getting out of control while descending steep grades. While some crossovers look like they are designed for mall parking lots and school pickup lanes, the XC70 looks every bit the part for an off-road capable vehicle.

    The smooth, clean lines of the V70 are interrupted on the XC70 with the extensive use of dark, matte plastic and bright, aluminum-colored trim encompassing the lower portion of the car. In addition to providing an aggressive look, the XC70’s plastic cladding adds increased ruggedness and scratch prevention on trails, as well as providing wider wheel flares to protect the 235/55R17 Continental tires. Unique front and rear fascias help give the XC70 a wider appearance with large, blocky fog light bezels up front and thick, accent reflectors out back. The Oyster Grey Metallic paint job on our test car was actually more of a light brown hue and, combined with the dark plastic cladding, gave the XC70 a very outdoorsy look.

    Despite the XC70’s rugged, off-road exterior, the cabin is an untouched carryover from the luxurious S80 that we tested last year. The optional leather seats were soft and provided exceptional support luxury, while all of the gadgetry and controls were within a close reach and easy to use. The center stack uses Volvo’s signature waterfall design that flows down into a gear shifter wrapped in more soft leather and surrounded by real wood inlays that are also found on the door panels and on the instrument panel. The leather seats and wood inlays were part of a $2,995 option package that also included the power moonroof, power passenger seat and a rearview mirror with compass and HomeLink.

    In fact, most of the added options on the XC70 we drove were inside the cabin. The $1,650 Dynaudio Package adds the Dynaudio premium sound system with Dolby ProLogic II surround sound, rear seat audio controls and headphone jacks and Sirius-ready stereo, while the $2,995 Climate and Child Booster Seats Package adds heated seats and windshield washer nozzles, rain sensor windshield wipers, headlamp washer nozzles and dual integrated, two-stage booster seats for children in the outboard seating positions of the rear seats.

    With the same amount of cargo capacity as the V70 wagon, the XC70 increases its utility by providing 33.3 cubic feet of cargo space while seating five passengers and up to 72.1 cubic feet with the 40/20/40 split rear seat folded down. For bulkier items, the XC70 comes standard with integrated roof racks and with the convenience of a fold flat passenger front seat, the XC70 can swallow items up to nine feet in length. The XC70 also has the ability to tow the dirtbikes or ATVs to the trails with a 3,300-pound maximum towing capacity.

    Powering the 2008 XC70 is Volvo’s proven 3.2-liter I-6 mated to a six-speed automatic Geartronic transmission with manual shift mode. Good news for those looking for a little more power, the 2009 XC70 will offer a turbocharged 3.0-liter I-6, which puts out 281 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque without sacrificing fuel economy. The XC70 gets an estimated 15 miles per gallon in the city and 22 mpg on the highway, and our test car averaged just over 19 mpg on mixed driving.

    Considering the XC70’s purpose, it still maintains a comfortable, smooth ride and is surprisingly agile on twisty roads. For such a tall vehicle, the XC70 exhibited little body roll in tight corners and the steering was very predictable. While this boxy Volvo probably won’t win any drag races, its quick acceleration and smooth shifting make it feel much faster than it probably is. Volvo says the XC70 can run from 0-60 mph in 8.1 seconds – about average for a vehicle in this class.

    Volvo’s commitment to safety is apparent on the latest XC70. The XC70’s side-curtain airbag extends lower to protect children in the integrated booster seats, while multiple crumple zones and whiplash protection help keep everyone inside the car safe in the event of an accident. Additional standard safety features include dynamic stability control with traction control, daytime running lights and a total of six airbags.

    The hard part to swallow for those cross shopping the XC70 against the Pilot, Highlander or even XC90 may be its price with a base MSRP of $37,775. Tack on the laundry list of optional luxury and premium features our test car had and the prices jumped up to $44,065. That price puts the XC70 about on par with some larger and roomier competition. In the end, though, it comes down to the ability to stand out among a sea of crossovers without giving up any of the rugged off-road capabilities that many buyers are accustomed to, and the 2008 Volvo XC70 delivers.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Review | New Jetta Reviews | VW Clean Diesel Sedan

    In the past, it seemed that drivers were always forced to choose between driving an exciting car or a “green” car. For 2009, Volkswagen shows that saving the environment (and money at the pump) doesn’t have to be a dull, boring experience. The Jetta TDI provides fuel economy estimates similar to most compact hybrids, but it offers the driving pleasure comparable to some factory-tuned subcompacts. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI.

       


    Volkswagen has engrained itself in the history of diesel-powered vehicles since the first diesel Rabbit hit U.S. shores in the 1970s. Although Volkswagen has continued offering a wide number of diesel vehicles since, the cars have become increasingly limited due to increasingly stringent regulations in overly polluted metropolitan areas like California and New England

    New for 2009, Volkswagen introduced the 50-state legal clean diesel Jetta TDI and Jetta SportWagen TDI, which should shatter all of the stereotypes associated with diesel cars. Gone are the fog of black smoke from the tailpipe and the loud clatter from the engine, while the increased fuel economy and reliability are still in place. With its EPA fuel economy of 30 miles per gallon in the city and 41 mpg on the highway (with manual transmission), VW now offers one of the most fuel-efficient sedans in its class and the only one to offer a diesel engine.

    While it might take an engineer to actually describe how the 2009 Jetta TDI’s technology works, any average consumer will instantly appreciate the lack of smoke, noise and lag. The Jetta TDI uses an advanced exhaust system, that includes a diesel particulate filter, NOx storage catalyst and H2S Slip Catalyst, to help eliminate all of the preconceived notions of diesel engines. The technology behind diesel fuel production has also changed over the years allowing the diesel-powered Jetta to comply with the latest regulations. As of September 2006, all gas station are required to sell only ultra low sulfur diesel (USLD), which is also referred to as clean diesel.

    The heart of the Jetta TDI is VW’s all-new turbocharged 2.0-liter I-4 with common-rail direct injection. With 140 horsepower and 236 lb-ft of torque, the Jetta TDI should easily manhandle a Prius, while still holding its own against anything a Corolla or Civic could throw at it. In normal driving conditions, the Jetta’s diesel engine is disciplined, yet responsive. Under hard acceleration, the all-season tires break loose for a quick chirp accompanied by a slight, almost unnoticeable, whine of turbocharger spool. The Jetta’s powerplant feels strong whether it’s called upon to climb a steep, winding road or to merge into heavy freeway traffic. Over 145 miles of mixed driving, the Jetta TDI got as much as 44 mpg.

    Directing the power to the front wheels, the Jetta TDI is available with either a six-speed manual transmission or VW’s six-speed automatic, dual clutch DSG® transmission. The latter, which features a sport mode and a Tiptronic® manual shift mode, will run an additional $1,100 for either the sedan or SportWagen variant. While the Jetta TDI offers the same DSG® transmission as the 2008 R32, there are no paddles mounted on the back of the steering wheel. As is the case with most cars, the manual transmission offers slightly better fuel economy over the automatic. With the automatic transmission, only a small amount of hesitation could be detected when the Jetta took sharp, uphill corners, but is probably a better option for continuous stop-and-go driving.

    Other than a small TDI badge on the lower right corner of the decklid, there are no visual differences between the base Jetta models and the Jetta TDI, which is good news. Like all other VW’s, the Jetta sports a prominent chrome grille up front and clean lines throughout the body. Faint creases along the hood and across the doors help add character and definition to the Jetta’s design. The 16-inch, split five-spoke alloy wheels not only add an aggressive aspect to the Jetta, but it also helps to improve stability.

    In sharp turns and twisty roads, the Jetta was confident and maintained its intended line. The four-wheel disc brakes performed well with no noticeable fade during long, downhill stopping maneuvers. With standard safety systems such as Electronic Stabilization Program (ESP), Electronic Brake Assist (EBA) and Anti-Slip Regulation (ASR), the Jetta can take on driving in almost any weather situation. The Jetta and Jetta SportWagen received four stars in frontal impact protection and five stars in side impact protection from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA).

    Awaiting us on the inside was the same comfortable interior that we grew fond of in the R32 and Jetta SportWagen. From the leather-wrapped steering wheel to the comfortable seats, all the surfaces inside the Jetta are soft to the touch. The height-adjustable driver’s seat and tilt and telescoping steering column help to ensure that the Jetta TDI’s pilot is perfectly situated. Even the deep “thud” that is heard when closing the doors gives the Jetta a sense of a safety.

    The base Jetta TDI is essentially the top-of-the-line model and the base price shows it. Even with a starting MSRP of $21,990 ($5,000 more than the base Jetta sedan), the TDI is an easy choice when factoring in fuel mileage and costs. In addition to the price of diesel falling compared to gasoline prices (as of September 15, 2008, the national average for diesel is just 20 cents higher than regular-grade gasoline, according to the Energy Information Administration), the 2009 Jetta TDI and Jetta SportWagen TDI are now eligible for a $1,300 Federal Income Tax Credit from the Internal Revenue Service.

    As if it would take more for Autotropolis.com to recommend the fuel-efficient, fun-to-drive, safe and affordable Jetta TDI, all 2009 Volkswagens come with the Carefree Maintenance Program, which covers all scheduled maintenance at no cost to the owner.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt Review | New Cobalt Reviews | Chevy Sedan Review

    Chevrolet has been spending a great deal of time and money recently bolstering its lineup with more fuel-efficient and competitive vehicles. As one of Chevrolet’s most successful vehicles, the Cobalt is now also one of company’s the most versatile offerings. From the fuel-efficient XFE to the high-performance SS, the Chevrolet Cobalt meets the needs of just about any driver. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.

       

    Designing a compact car these days seems to be getting more challenging for manufacturers with each new generation. Compact cars are renowned for their fuel efficiency, inexpensive sticker price and conservative styling, but a growing number of enthusiasts are beginning to expect more performance.

    Chevrolet’s Cobalt manages all of this despite a design that is growing ever closer to the end of its lifecycle. Although the Cobalt is available as a sedan or a coupe, the biggest news for 2009 is limited to the sedan. From best-in-class fuel economy to best bang-for-the-buck performance, the 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt comes in a wide variety of models to satisfy just about anyone’s driving desires. With highway fuel economy of 37 miles per gallon, the Cobalt XFE is the most fuel-efficient car among compact sedans, while the Cobalt SS offers 260 turbocharged horses for pure driving pleasure.

    With fuel costs becoming a main buying point, buyers should welcome the all-new Cobalt XFE. Available on the base Cobalt LS only, the XFE (Xtra Fuel Economy) package increases fuel economy through a few engineering upgrades and adjustments. Despite a slight bump in horsepower (from 148 to 155) in the XFE’s 2.2-liter I-4, the Cobalt XFE benefits from taller gear ratios in its five-speed manual transmission as well as recommended shift points lower in the RPM range. low rolling resistance tires and recommended shift points lower in the RPM range. In the end, the 2009 Cobalt XFE’s 37 highway mpg beats out all major competitors including the Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic and Ford Focus, while the 25 city mpg are right about average for the class.

    While the Cobalt XFE focuses on improving fuel efficiency, Chevrolet designed the new Cobalt SS sedan to handle just about any racetrack including the famed NĪ‹rburgring - where the Cobalt circled the 13-mile road course in 8:22.35 minutes. Joining the spunky Cobalt SS coupe, the sedan model provides the practicality of four doors without sacrificing any performance. Under the hood, the 2009 Cobalt SS comes with a turbocharged and intercooled 2.0-liter I-4 rated at 260 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque to provide a 0-60 mile per hour time of 5.7 seconds. Like the Cobalt XFE, the SS uses a five-speed manual transmission as its sole gearbox but is engineered to maximize performance by utilizing higher gear ratios than the base Cobalt. With EPA fuel economy estimates of 22 mpg city and 30 mpg highway, the Cobalt SS is more fuel efficient than its main competitors such as Mazda’s MazdaSpeed3 and the Dodge Caliber SRT4.

    The Cobalt SS features numerous exterior updates to improve aerodynamics and handling as well as helping to distinguish it from lesser Cobalt models. From aggressive front and rear fascias to unique rocker panels and decklid spoiler, the SS definitely stands out from the rest of the crowd. Up front, the conventional grille is replaced with diamond-mesh inserts, which not only provide a menacing look but also helps feed more air to the intercooler. The 18-inch, split five-spoke aluminum wheels are unique to the SS and come wrapped in low-profile Continental performance tires.

    Like most sports cars, the SS doesn’t just look good, but it performs well, too. For optimized handling capabilities, Chevrolet equipped the performance-tuned Cobalt with SS-specific stabilizer bars, spring rates and damper tuning for tight cornering. Despite being front-wheel drive, torque steer was nonexistent even during wide-open acceleration. Other than acceleration, braking is one of the most important aspects of a performance car, and the Cobalt SS delivers. With four-wheel vented disc brakes and Brembo® four-piston, fixed calipers up front, the Cobalt SS helps ease all that power to rest. Helping to further increase safety, GM’s proven StabiliTrak electronic stability control system is standard.

    Inside, both cars came equipped in base form. Although the XFE had crank windows and manual door locks, the standard XM satellite radio and OnStar service helped give it a more luxurious feeling. The seats were comfortable and provided adequate support and adjustments, while the split-colored instrument panel helped break up any possible monotony. As expected, the SS had all the possible power features and came filled to the brim with standard conveniences including SS-embroidered seats with added lateral support, a turbo boost gauge mounted on the A-pillar and a reconfigurable performance display. 

    With a starting MSRP of $15,010, the 2009 Cobalt XFE not only gets better fuel economy than all of its competition, but it costs less than most of them, too. To help reduce weight, all 2009 Cobalt models come standard with a tire inflator instead of a spare tire. The car we tested came with the optional spare tire ($75), anti-lock brakes ($400) and protection package (floor mats and body side moldings) ($180) for a total MSRP of $16,325. The Cobalt SS sedan we tested had a higher base price ($23,435), but every penny of that premium is instantly worth it the first time a MazdaSpeed3 or Dodge Caliber SRT4 is left looking at the Cobalt’s rear end.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • Comparison Review | 2009 Chevrolet Aveo5 and 2008 Honda Fit | New Hatchback Reviews

    With fuel economy becoming more important in the average consumer's buying process, manufacturers are introducing smaller, more fuel-efficient cars that offer similar cargo capacities as compact crossover SUVs. As far as fuel-efficient hatchbacks go, the Honda Fit is one of the most popular offerings on the market. For Chevrolet, the redesigned 2009 Aveo5 looks to bite into the Fit’s dominance among compact hatchbacks. Keep reading below to see how the 2009 Chevrolet Aveo5 matches up against the 2008 Honda Fit.

       

    With fuel economy becoming increasingly important to the average consumer, manufactures are scrambling to get smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles into their fleets without sacrificing the beloved cargo and passenger capacity that made SUVs and crossovers so popular in the first place. The answer? Hatchbacks, of course.

    The Chevrolet Aveo stands as the sole domestic competitor in the compact hatchback segment, while the Honda Fit is a relative newcomer but has become quite an icon for the segment. Recently, we had the opportunity to put the 2009 Aveo5 and 2008 Fit up against one another in real world driving situations, and the results we came up with may surprise (and even offend) some readers.

    For 2009, the Aveo5 received a full redesign to better compete with the Fit and other compact hatchbacks such as the Toyota Yaris, Nissan Versa and Scion xD. The result is a car that is a vast improvement over its predecessor and better equipped to take on its Japanese competition. Yes, the Aveo5 itself is a Korean-built car based off the Daewoo Kalos, but with a bowtie in the grille, the Aveo became the sole domestic compact hatchback when it was introduced in 2004. Honda’s Fit, called the Honda Jazz in most markets, has been in existence in its current form since 2001 abroad but had to wait until the 2007 model year to reach our shores.

    At first glance, both cars use a quirky, wedge-shaped design that is both functional and attractive. The Honda Fit we tested came as a Sport model, so the ground effects, 15-inch alloy wheels and decklid spoiler helped give it slightly better visual appeal. The Milano Red paint scheme didn’t hurt either compared to the Aveo5’s Tidewater Blue Metallic (comparisons to Lavender and Periwinkle weren’t uncommon). Adding to the Fit’s sporty exterior, are the body-colored headlights similar to what’s found on the latest Chevrolet Corvette and Ferrari 355. Chevrolet did manage to make the large grille, inspired by the 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, look good on the small Aveo5, although the chrome fender vents looked like a cheesy, last-minute decision.

    The whole point of buying a compact hatchback in the first place is to see a return in fuel economy, and both cars deliver. With its 106-horsepower DOHC I-4, the 2009 Chevy Aveo5 gets an estimated 25 miles per gallon city and 34 mpg highway. The 2008 Honda Fit Sport uses a 109-horsepower, 1.5-liter SOHC I-4 with VTEC to get an estimated 27 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. Not only did both cars hit their marks for fuel economy, but with their petite fuel tanks, fill-ups were relatively cheap, too.

    On paper, the Fit seemed to have an advantage with its five-speed automatic transmission, but we soon found out that in daily driving, the Aveo5’s four-speed automatic was better behaved. In the city, the Fit never seemed to find the right gear, while highway driving saw many unnecessary downshifts. Our Honda Fit Sport also included steering wheel-mounted shifter paddles, which seemed about as necessary and purposeful as the Chevy’s fender vents.

    Inside, both cars provide an atmosphere that is inviting and feels much larger than the cars actually are. The Fit may hold a slight advantage when it comes to ergonomics and layout, however, with a smoother, more straightforward design. The instrument panel sits low and allows for small quarter windows at the base of the A-pillars to provide more light and a more spacious feeling. The integrated cupholders and sporty three-spoke steering wheel are easy to overlook, but are very appreciated. The Aveo5’s instrument panel is upright and uses swaths of faux brushed aluminum that help to prevent the dash, steering wheel and shifter and door panels from becoming a wide expanse of hard grey plastic. The digital clock mounted top of the dash was a thoughtful and useful detail.

    The Aveo5 has a clear advantage over the Fit when it comes to comfort especially on long hauls. After an hour or so, the Fit’s seats start getting a little uncomfortable, and to make matters even worse, there is no center armrest. One unusual design aspect hampered comfort was the placement of the Fit’s fuel tank under the front seats. On highway trips with the cruise engaged, it’s nice to have a place to rest your legs for a moment - the intrusive humps near the transmission tunnel prevent that possibility.

    Chevrolet’s offering did have some of its own quirks, but, thankfully, it offered an armrest for the driver. Our main gripe about the Chevy’s cabin was the lack of a main door lock switch and/or automatic door locks. Other than the key fob, the only way to lock or unlock all of the doors with power was to pull up or depress the door lock plunger, which proved to be rather aggravating. Also, the pop out cupholders provided little support for larger beverages.

    One major advantage the Aveo5 has is the luxurious convenience of OnStar, and like all Chevrolet vehicles, the first year of service is on the house. While OnStar may not be a replacement for navigation systems, it is definitely a welcomed device on a sub-$14,000 economy car.

    Both cars managed to provide surprising amounts of headroom and legroom. With the front seats all the way back, the Fit and Aveo5 provided adequate legroom even for taller passengers. With the seats folded flat, the Fit and Aveo5 hold their fair share of cargo (41.9 and 42.0 cubic feet, respectively). Due to its tall roof and low load floor, the Fit holds a considerable cargo advantage with the rear seat in place (21.3 versus 7.1). The Fit’s rear seats have a unique design that lets them fold completely flat, or fold the seat bottoms up to allow for very tall items to fit in between the front and back seats.

    When it comes to safety, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) scored both cars pretty well. Although both cars come standard with tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS), they also both experienced the erroneous illumination of the low tire pressure warning light. The only faults we could find about either car’s design when it came to safety, was the Fit’s 3-star side-impact crash score for rear-seat passengers and the Chevrolet’s lack of standard anti-lock brakes (ABS).

    In base trim, the Honda Fit comes in at just under $14,000 with a $13,950 MSRP, while the Aveo5 stands as one of the most inexpensive new cars on the market with a $11,460 MSRP, but trim levels and accessories bumped our test cars’ prices considerably. The Sport package on the Honda Fit raised the base price to $16,070, but came handsomely equipped with power windows, keyless entry, cruise control, AM/FM/CD stereo with auxiliary jack and automatic transmission for a $16,705 as-tested price. The Chevrolet Aveo5 we tested came in the mid-level 1LT package and added the Power and Convenience Package (power door locks, keyless entry and power windows), automatic transmission, cruise control and anti-lock brakes (ABS) for an as-tested price of $16,295.

    In our opinion, the 2009 Aveo5 is the better choice between the two cars, which should be expected against a car that is eight years more technologically advanced. The real test for the new Aveo5 will be the all-new 2009 Honda Fit, which hits showrooms later this month.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2008 Audi S5 Review | New S5 Reviews | Audi Coupe Review

    Aside from the R8 supercar, the 2008 A5 and performance-enhanced S5 are by far the most attractive vehicles in Audi’s remarkable lineup. All new for 2008, the A5/S5 line provides Audi with a sporty coupe to complement the A4/S4 sedans. With its powerful engine and Autobahn-tuned suspension, the S5 is more than just eye candy. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2008 Audi A5 and S5.

       

    When it comes to sedans, Audi has had things covered for quite a while. From the athletic A4 up to the luxurious A8, the four-ringed German manufacturer has made a name for itself creating sedans with the latest technology, luxury and performance components. Just a quick look at Audi’s recent coupe history, though, and it’s easy to see that, except for two well-built niche coupes (the TT and R8), Audi has been content on letting their competitors have all the fun in this segment.

    Until now.

    Sporting one of the most attractive designs among modern automobiles, Audi added the A5 and sportier S5 models to its lineup for 2008. Aside from the aforementioned coupes, the cute TT and mid-engine R8 supercar, Audi hasn’t had a practical coupe since the early 1990s. In addition to adding a competent coupe to go up against the like of the BMW 3 Series coupe, Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class or Infiniti G37, the all-new A5 adds another option for performance enthusiasts not in the market for a sedan or wagon.

    The flawless execution of the 2008 Audi A5 design can be traced back to the 2003 Audi Nuvolari quattro concept car. The A5 kept the concept’s long hood and short decklid to help give the production model classic sports car proportions with a modern flair. Unlike the abundance of fender vents, ground effect kits and decklid spoilers that afflict other factory-tuned performance cars, the S5’s exterior is clean and uncluttered, yet unmistakable. The transformation from A5 to S5 would be about the same as Clark Kent just taking off his glasses to become Superman.

    The minimal changes on the S5 necessary for the added performance and safety components are a testament to the solid design of the A5. Besides the obvious S5 and V-8 badges, the lower air inlets in the front fascia have been enlarged and slightly reshaped, while the reworked rear fascia reveals quad-tipped dual exhaust - twice as many outlets as the A5. In profile, the S5-specific five-spoke 19-inch wheels expose larger brake calipers emblazoned with the S5 logos, which easily overshadow the reshaped rocker panels and aluminum-clad exterior mirrors.

    Even though the S5 attracted its fair share of attention while cruising around town, this performance coupe is more than just eye candy. With the same 354-horsepower, direct injected 4.2-liter FSI V-8 as the S4 variants (Cabriolet and Avant) we recently tested, the S5 delivers its maximum power at an amazing 6,800 rpm. Putting all that power to the road is Audi’s quattro® permanent all-wheel drive system, standard on both the A5 and S5, through the six-speed manual gearbox. From a dead stop, the S5 can hit 60 miles per hour in less than five seconds. The harmony between the high-pitch whine of the engine and the low rumble of the exhaust under hard acceleration provides just one more thing to love about this car.

    The unfortunate part of the S5’s acceleration is the dismal fuel economy. It could be assumed that most S5 drivers won’t be feathering the accelerator or fretting over gas prices, so the 14 miles per gallon city and 21 mpg highway might be a bit conservative. The S5’s fuel economy numbers are low enough to require a gas-guzzler tax of $1,300.

    The low-slung Audi handles corners with ease; the steering is effortless and precise, while the bigger brakes provide quicker stops than the A5. The almost-prefect 51/49 weight distribution gives the S5 nimble, confident handling and feels at home in twisting S-curves. While brick-paved roads

    Inside, the four-passenger S5 provides a perfect balance between sport and luxury. As much as we liked the S4’s interior, the S5 is practically flawless. The positioning of buttons and controls was only sligh The front seats were able to match the car’s double duty as luxury sports coupe. Over long trips, the seats were supportive and comfortable, but when testing the cars acceleration and handling, the seats provided sufficient side bolstering as well as adjustable thigh support.

    On paper, the S5 is listed as a four-passenger vehicle, but after a quick inspection, it becomes obvious the rear two passengers would have to be quite small to fit comfortably. On a short trip, we had an average-sized male passenger ride in the back, and the cramped headroom and legroom forced our backseat passenger to sit diagonally across the seat. One area the S5 had surprising room was in the trunk. Despite the short decklid, the 2008 Audi S5 can store up to 16.1 cubic feet of cargo – more than the BMW 3 Series and Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class.

    The starting MSRP for the S5 is $50,500, but our well-equipped test model, which included the navigation system ($2,390) with the helpful Multi Media Interface (MMI), technology package ($1,700) featuring adaptive headlights and rear parking system with rearview camera, Bang & Olufsen® premium sound system ($850) and gas-guzzler tax and destination charge, had a $57,515 price tag. Even at this price, the well-equipped S5 seems like quite a bargain when compared against the M3 or CLK550 despite giving up a few horses.

    After a week in the S5, the only thing that disappointed us about Audi’s all-new S5 is the rumor of a cabriolet version on the horizon. With a profile like this, it would be a shame to see this car go topless.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2008 Mazda MAZDA3 5-door Review | New MAZDA3 Reviews | Mazda Hatchback Review

    The 2008 Mazda MAZDA3, better known simply as the 3, perfectly blends the combination of a sporty attitude, good looks and a low price. From a company that produces everything from fun-to-drive roadsters and coupes to stylish and sporty crossovers, it is easy to see why the MAZDA3 has quickly become the benchmark of the compact econo-sedan/hatchback segment. Keep reading below for a full review of the 2008 Mazda MAZDA3 5-door.

       


    Nobody ever said that the switch from large SUVs to small, fuel-efficient cars was going to be easy. As Americans scramble to get out of vehicles that were probably too big for them in the first place, many still crave the added convenience SUVs provided when it comes to cargo room. One of the largest, and fastest, transitions in the automotive industry may see the loathed station wagon and hatchback become a popular car on American streets.

    One of the front-runners in the hatchback race is the 5-door version of Mazda’s popular MAZDA3, more commonly referred to simply as the 3. Building off the already impressive looks of its sedan counterpart, the 2008 Mazda 3 5-door offers comfortable room for five passengers plus their luggage and fuel economy that won’t make a road trip painful. Throw in the fact that the 3 rides on the same platform as the Volvo C30 that we tested not too long ago and it’s easy to see why the 2008 MAZDA3 is one of the most fun-to-drive, fuel-efficient cars on the market. 

    Successor to the Mazda Protégé, the 3 was originally launched as a 2004 model. For most cars, the five-year mark represents the point where the design starts to appear old and worn, but the 2008 MAZDA3 looks as fresh as the first one did in 2003. In both sedan and 5-door guise, the 3 possesses an athletic and sporty look that was introduced on the MAZDA6 and has since been incorporated, in one way or another, into the designs of some of Mazda’s latest iconic vehicles including the CX-9 and MX-5. Although many competitors have sprouted up over the years, few can match the 3’s style and attitude.

    From its pointy front end to its sculpted rear haunches, the 3 has an athletic look that is instantly recognizable. With its main competition coming from cars such as the Toyota Matrix and Dodge Caliber, the 3 offers a sportier, more attractive design. The “standard” hatchback look is somewhat reduced thanks to the sloped roofline and unique rear quarter windows. From the rear, the clear-lensed taillights and blacked-out rear “diffuser” gave the low-slung 3 an aggressive look. Our test car came in Golden Sand Metallic and topped off with 17-inch, five-spoke bright aluminum alloy wheels wrapped in Goodyear all-season rubber.

    Inside, Mazda’s entry-level hatchback continued to impress. The Touring package features a leather-wrapped sport steering wheel and piano black inserts that accentuate the three large electroluminescent gauges, while the soft, cloth seats provide extensive comfort and support. For added driver convenience, the MAZDA3 offers tilt and telescoping steering column, steering wheel mounted audio and cruise controls as well as adjustable driver’s seat height and lumbar support.

    Adding to the fun/quirky operations inside the 3, during station or volume changes a series of LED lights would illuminate in a directional manner that instantly brought back memories of Knight Rider’s K.I.T.T. The only disappointments that stuck out to us in the 3’s cabin are the small, cluttered stereo display and the vast expanse of hard plastic along the top of the instrument panel that lacked the high-quality feel as some of its competition.

    The main advantage of driving a hatchback over a sedan is the increase in cargo capacity, and the 2008 Mazda 3 does not disappoint. While being slightly outmatched by the Matrix and Caliber in terms of maximum capacity, the 3 still offers a respectable 43.8 cubic feet of cargo room with 17.1 cubic feet of that located behind the 60/40 split folding rear seat. For wet or dirty items, the 3 provides a hidden, plastic-lined storage area under the rear cargo floor with a lid that doubles as a cargo divider.

    In addition to the Volvo C30, the MAZDA3 also shares its platform with Europe’s spirited version of the Ford Focus giving it surprising handling capabilities over similarly sized cars. Coming in at just under 3,000 pounds, the 3’s suspension is nimble and the steering is precise providing handling that feels confident and capable in abrupt maneuvers, while the powertrain provides enjoyable acceleration out of the gate.

    Under the hood, the 3 sedan is available with two engine options, a 148-horsepower 2.0-liter four cylinder in “i” trim or a 156-horsepower 2.3-liter four cylinder in “s” trim, while the 5-door only offers the latter. Although a five-speed manual transmission is standard, our test car came equipped with a five-speed automatic transmission, which delivered EPA fuel economy rated at 22 miles per gallon in the city and 29 mpg on the highway. This powertrain combination provides ample acceleration (0-60 mph in the 8-second range) without being too noisy or lethargic.

    For those looking for a little better performance and handling, the MAZDASPEED3 is a factory-tuned hatch that comes with a turbocharged, 263-horspower version of the 2.3-liter engine and a bargain sticker price of just $23,090.
     
    Entry price for the base 3 sedan is $14,645, while the 5-door starts at $18,675. The car we tested had a base price of $19,375 but added Sirius satellite radio ($430), moonroof/in-dash six-disc CD changer package ($890) and destination charge ($635) for an as-tested price of $21,330. For first time car buyers or those just looking to get into a more fuel-efficient (but still fun to drive) car, the 2008 MAZDA3 is a definite must see.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2008 GMC Yukon Hybrid Review | New Yukon Reviews | GMC Two-Mode Hybrid Review

    When it comes to full-size, truck-based SUVs, the GMC Yukon is one of the few remaining on the market. While hybrids and SUVs seem to be polar opposites in light of ever-rising gasoline prices, the 2008 GMC Yukon Hybrid adds state-of-the-art, fuel-saving technology to an already powerful drivetrain and spacious interior. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2008 GMC Yukon Two-Mode Hybrid.

       


    When General Motors first announced its plans to launch hybrid models of its popular pickup truck and SUV lineup, critics clamored that such a big hybrid was a waste of technology. In reality, getting a small car to average 45 miles per gallon shouldn’t be all that hard, but getting a massive SUV weighing in at just under three tons to average over 20 mpg is very impressive.

    That is just what GM has accomplished in launching hybrid models of the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon (with Cadillac Escalade, Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra models to follow later this year). When it comes to "green cars," GM is the leading manufacturer of hybrid models.

    GMC added the two-mode hybrid model to a Yukon lineup that now boasts four distinct models – the base Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali and Yukon Hybrid. The 2008 GMC Yukon Hybrid uses technology shared with BMW and the former DaimlerChrysler along with a more efficient, yet still powerful, engine to improve EPA fuel economy estimates to 21 mpg city and 22 mpg on the highway for two-wheel drive models (20 city/20 highway on four-wheel drive models).

    The Yukon’s Two-Mode Hybrid system combines a 300-volt nickel-metal hydride battery pack with a unique four-speed automatic transmission that incorporates two electric motors. One impressive aspect of the Yukon Hybrid is its ability to go up to 30 mph on electric power only, although acceleration has to be slow and steady. Still there is something eerie and awe inspiring of a vehicle this big rolling around at neighborhood speeds emitting no pollutants and a quiet, high-pitched whine from the motors. Even the Yukon Hybrid’s tires are specifically designed with quiet-tuned tread and provide low-rolling resistance.

    When coming to an idle either at a stop light or in a parking lot, the engine shuts off and the Yukon Hybrid goes into Auto Mode. Even with the engine not running, the A/C system, power steering and brakes all work as would be expected.

    The other impressive aspect of the hybrid system is, of course, the fuel economy gains. After being informed that I would have two weeks behind the wheel of the Yukon Hybrid, I decided to spend the first week dedicated to getting the best possible mileage by altering my driving style to include taking off slowly from lights to keep the electric motors engaged and the engine off for as long as possible. This resulted in an astonishing 23.3 mpg – ALL in the city. The second week, I drove at my normal pace and still managed a respectable 21.4 mpg in mixed driving. 

    Similar to the other Tahoe and Yukon vehicles, large blind spots exist despite the relatively large side mirrors. With all the technology this vehicle has, a simple blind spot detection device would be extremely useful.

    The advanced technology of the two-mode hybrid system is probably the biggest factor in the 50-percent city mileage improvement, but the slight gain in highway fuel economy (up 15 percent) is due more to the unique aerodynamics and the engine’s Active Fuel Management system.

    Visually, there is no mistaking the Yukon Hybrid for a base Yukon. Besides the numerous stickers and badges announcing it as a hybrid (which there are eight of), the Yukon Hybrid also gets unique body panels that help reduce drag and weight. Up front, the redesigned fascia features a lower air dam and is devoid of fog lights and tow hooks, which help to make the leading edge smoother. Also, the grille opening is taller to improve air flow to the radiator and engine compartment.

    Helping to make the already handsome design of the Yukon look and act slicker, the roof racks have been eliminated and the rear end received aerodynamic improvements such as a revised rear fascia, a deeper roof spoiler with built-in LED stop light and aerodynamically shaped D-pillar appliqués and LED taillights. Finally, to help compensate for the additional weight of the hybrid system, the Yukon Hybrid features extensive use of aluminum such as the hood and liftgate.

    Inside, there is little to differentiate the Yukon Hybrid from the regular Yukon’s already ergonomic and useful interior. The main differences for the Yukon Hybrid are limited to the instrument cluster, front seats and, of course, the 300-volt battery pack unobtrusively perched beneath the second-row seats.

    The cluster, it allows the driver scroll through various screens to view what mode the engine is in and what type of fuel economy the Yukon Hybrid is getting. Additionally, the driver can easily see what mode the engine and hybrid system are in by either the instant economy screen or the navigation system. The information screen is built into the tachometer and shows instant fuel economy and what mode the engine is in. The standard 6.5-inch touch-screen navigation system doubles as a monitor to show the driver what mode the hybrid system is in as well as whether the vehicle is in Auto Mode.

    Legroom and headroom for front and second-row passengers is generous. GMC used different front seats that help to reduce mass and decrease overall vehicle weight but has no effect on comfort. Actually, the thinner front seats increases legroom for the second-row seat by 1.5 inches.

    Due to the solid rear axle and tried-and-true suspension system, the floor pan of the Yukon is not equipped to allow the third-row seats to offer stadium-style seating or to fold flat. While the seats aren’t difficult to remove, they are moderately heavy and are a nuisance when compared to the Ford Expedition’s electric fold-flat seats. With only 25.4 inches of rear legroom, taller passengers may want to avoid the third row. One benefit of sitting in the third row is the proximity to a standard household electrical outlet.

    As expected from a large SUV, the Yukon Hybrid comes with a powerful 6.0-liter V-8 putting out 322 horsepower and 367 lb-ft of torque. Helping to maximize efficiency, the engine also features GM’s Active Fuel Management system, which operates the engine as a V-4 when the vehicle reaches cruising speeds. The transition between the V-4 and V-8 modes is slightly noticeable feeling similar to a late, harsh shift. When coming to stops, the operation of the electric motors and regenerative braking make the Yukon Hybrid sound something like R2-D2.

    Cargo capacity for the Yukon Hybrid is identical to the other Yukon models. With the rear seats removed and the second row folded forward, the Yukon can swallow up to 108.9 cubic feet. Towing capacity is affected however dropping from 7,500 pounds (in Yukon 2WD) to 6,200 (in Yukon Hybrid 2WD).

    Base MSRP for the two-wheel drive 2008 Yukon Hybrid is $50,045 – a $13,800 premium. As expected from a vehicle in this price range, the Yukon Hybrid comes standard with a laundry list of luxury and convenience features.

    For returning GM customers looking to get into one of the new Tahoe or Yukon hybrid models, now is the time. GM is offering a $4,000 cash rebate until June 30, 2008 to current 1999 and newer GM vehicle owners and lessees.

    2008 GMC Yukon Hybrid Pictures and Wallpapers


    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2008 Mazda CX-9 Review | New CX-9 Reviews | Mazda Crossover Review

    The 2008 Mazda CX-9 is the award-winning, seven-passenger crossover with a sporty, aggressive design for which Mazda is known. Complementing the smaller CX-7 in Mazda’s lineup, the CX-9 offers three rows of seating with space for the whole family and room left over to haul enough gear for a weekend excursion. Keep reading below for a full review of the 2008 Mazda CX-9.

       


    A recent problem in the crossover segment seems to be that form and function don’t always go hand in hand. While the edgy, stylish crossovers offer attractive looks they often suffer when it comes to interior space, while the cavernous and roomy selections tend to exhibit uninspiring, sometimes minivan-ish designs. Mazda’s family-sized crossover, the 2008 CX-9, manages a spectacular design with spacious accommodations for seven passengers.

    Between the CX-9 and the slightly smaller CX-7, Mazda has itself an incredible 1-2 punch in the crossover market that few, if any, manufacturers can compete with.

    Based off the same platform as the Ford Edge, the 2008 Mazda CX-9 was a hit right from the start. Not just any vehicle could take home such prestigious awards as Motor Trend’s SUV of the Year and the North American Truck of the Year in the same year, so the fact that the 2008 Mazda CX-9 now boasts both awards in its trophy case should make it an even more enticing buy. For those looking for a crossover that mixes stellar looks with a spacious interior and powerful, decently efficient engine, the CX-9 should be on the short list of what to check out.

    If CX-9 looks familiar, don’t worry, it’s not déjà vu. The CX-9’s design is essentially a stretched out and more toned-down version of the CX-7, making it more palatable to those turned off by the CX-7’s somewhat ostentatious looks. The distinct profile of the CX-9 is highlighted by the steeply raked windshield, downward-sloping roofline and rising beltline. Active Bi-Xenon headlights, massive 10-spoke, 20-inch alloy wheels and trapezoidal dual exhaust outlets finish off the CX-9’s elegant look.

    The Liquid Platinum Metallic paint and extensive, yet tasteful, use of chrome trim made the CX-9 look flashy enough for a night out on the town, but not too fancy during the daily commute either.  Aside from the Suzuki XL7 and GM’s Lambda quadruplets (Acadia, Enclave, Outlook and Traverse), few crossovers offer this much style, space and efficiency, not to mention a ride height and aggressive looks that wouldn’t look entirely out of place if taken off road.
     
    Despite the tall ground clearance, the CX-9 is surprisingly easy to get into, and once inside, a spacious, luxurious interior awaits. A pleasant mix of soft leather and wood and aluminum trim accents welcomes front passengers, while piano black inserts on the steering wheel, center stack and center console help finish off the classy ambiance. From the driver’s seat, the touch-screen navigation is easy to use and the instrument cluster uses orange electroluminescent lighting with blue backlights to give the gauges a sporty and welcoming look.

    When compared to the CX-7’s interior, the extra space pays off. The added five inches of wheelbase and 15 inches of overall length not only provided the CX-9 with enough headroom and legroom to seat a basketball team’s starting five comfortably, but it also allowed the sleek crossover to come with a comfortable third-row seat. The second row seats slide forward to increase third-row legroom when needed, while also tilting and sliding forward out of the way making ingress and egress to the back seat an easy task. Even taller third-seat passengers will enjoy the headroom and legroom (35.4 inches and 32.4 inches, respectively) provided by the CX-9.

    In addition to the ample comfort, Mazda also offers many convenience packages into its CX-9 – albeit at a considerable premium. The CX-9 Grand Touring that we tested came with almost $5,500 worth of optional upgrades to the interior. The GT Assist package ($2,500) added the power liftgate and a touch-screen DVD navigation system with a built-in rear-view camera, while the Rear-seat Entertainment system ($2,560) featured an 11-speaker, 296-watt Bose® 5.1 Surround Sound system and a rear seat DVD player incorporated into the headliner with a nine-inch flip-down monitor. A standard feature on the Grand Touring model was the calculator-sized smart key, which was surprisingly large but the simple operation of Mazda’s advanced keyless entry and start system more than made up for it

    The sole powertrain for the CX-9 received a modest power boost for 2008 switching to Mazda’s 273-horsepower, 3.7-liter DOHC V-6 with 273 lb-ft of torque mated to a six-speed automatic with a manual sport shift mode. While the model we tested sent power to the front wheels only, all-wheel drive is an option for Mazda’s flagship vehicle. Fortunately, the power increase didn’t have a major affect on fuel economy with EPA estimates of 16 miles per gallon city and 22 on the highway.

    Smooth shifts and instant power made the CX-9 fun to drive, but the true enjoyment behind the wheel came on roads that would have any Mazda vehicle feeling at home. Despite a 4,312-pound curb weight, the CX-9 felt as nimble and confident as anyone could expect from a seven-passenger vehicle thanks in large part to the four-wheel independent suspension and four-wheel vented disc brakes.

    Having all that power means nothing if it can’t get the dirty work done, too. With the optional ($535) towing package, the CX-9 is capable of towing up to 3,500 pounds. If towing a trailer is not necessary, the CX-9’s cavernous interior can swallow up to 100.7 cubic feet of cargo with all of the seats folded flat. 

    Thanks to three-row side-curtain airbags and front and rear crumple zones, the CX-9 achieved a five-star safety rating for frontal and side impact protection from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. Additional standard safety systems include roll stability control, dynamic stability control with traction control and three-point seat belts for all three rows of passengers.

    An optional ($200) blind spot monitoring system is available, and although it came in handy in heavy traffic, it occasionally came on erroneously when driving next to cement barriers on the interstate. When an object was detected in the CX-9’s blind spot, a light would illuminate on the corresponding exterior mirror, and if the turn signal was used indicating a lane change in that direction, an audible beep would sound further warning the driver.

    The starting MSRP for the base CX-9 Sport is $29,400, but without self-restraint from checking the option boxes, the bottom line can climb high and quick. The 2008 CX-9 Grand Touring starts at $33,355, but the model we tested came with enough interior upgrades to make your ordinary family trip turn into an extraordinary adventure and added up to an as-tested price of $40,330.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2009 Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen Review | New Jetta Reviews | VW Station Wagon Review

    The 2009 Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen is the all-new compact station wagon set to go on sale this summer. In addition to using the same attractive design as its sedan counterpart, the 2009 Jetta SportWagen offers enough cargo capacity to rival some of the more popular compact crossovers on the market. Keep reading below for a full review of the 2009 Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen.

       


    Since 2003, if prospective car buyers wanted a Volkswagen with sufficient size and space, the choice was limited by default to the rugged Touareg SUV. Those looking for a less expensive, smaller option that offered ample storage but not SUV-like fuel economy were out of luck at VW dealerships.

    Three new Volkswagens aim to solve that problem when they debut this year. The Volkswagen Tiguan, Routan and Jetta SportWagen will all be in VW showrooms by this fall and offer completely different approaches to hauling passengers and their gear.

    Somewhere in between the compact hatchback Rabbit and compact crossover Tiguan sits VDub’s all-new station wagon, the 2009 Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen. Set to go on sale this summer, the SportWagen adds the one key aspect that the already-solid Rabbit/Jetta lineup currently lacks: space. As fuel prices rise and drivers search for a more fuel efficient alternative to large, bulky SUVs and crossovers, Volkswagen is betting that small, spacious station wagons become a wild success.

    The main draw of the Jetta SportWagen is going to be the improved cargo capacity when compared to other similar Volkswagens like the Rabbit. Surprisingly, the Tiguan and the SportWagen share basic chassis components although the station wagon holds a distinct advantage when it comes to storing gear. With seating for five, the SportWagen can offers up to 32.8 cubic feet of storage space, but opens up to 66.9 cubic feet by easily folding the second row seats flat (for comparison, the Tiguan holds 23.8 cubic feet with the seat up and 56.1 cubic feet with the seat folded down).

    Upon first glance, the SportWagen is identical to the Jetta sedan from the B-pillar forward, while the cargo area carries a similar design to the Rabbit’s unique hatch and C-pillar. In transforming the Jetta from a sleek sedan into a station wagon, Volkswagen did not compromise the car’s overall look, feel or driving characteristics. Aside from keeping most of the crucial lines and curves that make the Jetta and Rabbit so unique, the extra sheet metal added only 55 pounds to the total weight - keeping the 3,285-pound station wagon nimble.

    The overall experience of the SportWagen was just as its name suggests – sporty. The four-wheel independent suspension may not have allowed the SportWagen to corner like the S4 Avant (review soon to come), but it handled as one would expect from what is essentially an extended-length Rabbit. The truth is, the SportWagen feels like the small hatchback or sedan from which it is derived rather than a typical station wagon or compact crossover to which it will most likely be compared against. 

    As much as we loved the interior of the R32 and Eos we have recently tested, it was nice to see what the base trim levels offered – and it was surprisingly pleasant. The dash layout, center stack and center console were pretty much the same, but the SportWagen was devoid of sport seats or flashy dash inserts. The cloth seats were comfortable on long trips and the driver’s seat allowed for precise adjustment with the manually adjustable fore and aft position and seat bottom height and the power-adjustable seat back angle. The tilting and telescoping steering column not only ensured that the driver had optimal comfort to prevent fatigue, but also gave an unobstructed view of the instrument gauges and driver controls.

    Unfortunately, the SportWagen we tested wasn’t equipped with VW’s optional 2.0-liter TDI four-cylinder diesel, but the standard 2.5-liter inline five cylinder performed surprisingly well. At times, the 170 horsepower felt a little underpowered, but the six-speed automatic Tiptronic transmission took up most of the noticeable slack. Even with the standard Electronic Stability Program engaged, the front wheels still managed to break loose at times under hard acceleration.

    Unlike the rest of VW’s lineup, the SportWagen is designed to run on regular 87-octane saving a little bit of savings at the pump when filling the 14.5-gallon fuel tank. With estimated EPA fuel economy of 21 mpg city and 29 mpg highway, the Jetta SportWagen is slightly more fuel efficient than the popular compact crossovers such as the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4.

    Prices have yet to be announced for the 2009 Jetta SportWagen, but with the sedan starting at $16,990, a base price in the low-$20,000 range isn’t unreasonable with the TDI model probably coming with a mid to upper $20,000 price tag.

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2008 Audi S4 Avant Review | New S4 Reviews | Audi Station Wagon Review

    The 2008 Audi S4 Avant is a performance-minded station wagon that is ready and eager for track duty with enough cargo room available to make a run to the nearest home improvement store afterward. With its high-horsepower V-8 engine and sport-tuned suspension, the S4 Avant is for anyone who has ever wished that sports cars could hold more than a small set of golf clubs. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2008 Audi S4 Avant.

       


    Few words in the automotive world come with such a pariah as “station wagon.” Yes, “gas guzzler” and “minivan” both carry negative connotations to some, but then again big trucks and SUVs are stilling selling (albeit slower each day) and minivans are continue to be the vehicle of choice in school drop-off lanes.

    In Europe, however, station wagons are generally referred to as estate cars and, ironically, are pretty popular. Semantics or not, station wagons are about as popular in Europe as crossover SUVs are here in the States.

    Audi took things a step further by creating its own name for the station wagon – Avant – and applied it to its top-selling A4/S4 line, which also includes cabriolet and sedan models. Intent on avoiding any terms associating the S4 with a run of the mill grocery getter, Audi gave the S4 Avant a powerful engine, sport-tuned suspension and a stylish, yet restrained designed. With the market shifting away from large, bulky SUVs and a growing number of manufacturers introducing station wagon variants of popular sedan models, Audi may have a unique hit on its hands with the high-performance 2008 S4 Avant.

    Station wagons may have had their peak during the pre-minivan era here in the States, but the look and feel of the S4 Avant is reminiscent of classic American muscle cars. Similar to the S4 sedan, the Avant has a design that design that is simple and proportionate and uses minor cues to add to its performance stance. Visually, the S4 Avant uses a crisp crease just below the beltline to avoid a slab-sided body, while the blacked-out B- and C-pillars further add to the clean, unsuspecting look. In fact, the 2008 S4 Avant could have easily been the poster child for a classic sleeper if not for the attention-grabbing Imola Yellow paint scheme (a $750 option) – good news for drivers looking to get noticed, but bad news for drivers looking to anonymously explore all of the throaty V-8’s 340 horses.

    Only minor differences distinguish the S4 Avant from its A4 counterpart avoiding the unnecessary, gaudy clutter that curse most factory-tuned cars. Aside from the lower ride height, the only main visual cues to the upgraded status of Audi’s performance wagon are the quad-tipped dual exhaust outlets, lower door-mounted rocker panel enhancements, aluminum exterior mirrors and roof rails and, finally, the S4-specific brake calipers that proudly display the S4 logo. Audi’s Convenience Package finishes off the look of the S4 Avant by adding Adaptive Front Lighting to the Bi-Xenon headlights and 18-inch, seven-double spoke wheels wrapped in Continental high-performance rubber.

    On a clear, sunny Florida afternoon, Clearwater’s Sunshine Dragstrip opened up its lanes to us. While the sport-tuned suspension is probably more at home on a road course, the S4 Avant did not disappoint in straight acceleration - going from 0-60 mph in just 5.3 seconds. Compared to the Cabriolet, the Avant benefited from a solid roof and was 200 pounds lighter making it feel even faster off the line and more nimble when taking corners. The S4-emblazoned calipers not only looked good, but also helped bring the Avant to a stop with no noticeable fade.

    After testing the S4 Cabriolet a few weeks ago, we couldn’t help but appreciate how effortless power was sent from the pedal to the pavement. The Avant’s drivetrain was the same as the Cabriolet and left us with the same level of satisfaction. The 4.2-liter V-8 still put out a high-revving 340 horsepower (peaking at 7,000 rpm), the six-speed manual provided smooth, effortless shifts sending power to all four wheels via Audi’s famed quattro® permanent all-wheel drive system.

    With all its raw power and handling capabilities, something had to give with the S4 Avant. Driving full throttle into turns and quick zero to 60 mph jaunts might be fun, but the resulting fuel mileage can cause a slight pain at the pump. With EPA estimates of 13 mpg city and 20 mpg highway, the only thing more agonizing than watching the gas gauge drop is filling the 16.6–gallon gas tank with premium unleaded only. But then again, this is no economy car and it almost begs to be driven hard as often as possible. The required gas-guzzler tax adds $1,700 to the 2008 S4 Avant’s final price.

    Inside, the offers Recaro® seats with Alcantara inserts and optional ($400) carbon fiber trim surrounding the shifter and cutting through the middle of the instrument panel and door trim panels to continue the car’s sporty theme. For the front passengers, sport bucket seats provided racecar-like bolstering without creating an overly harsh or uncomfortable ride, while all seats benefit from the luxurious look and feel of the suede-like Alcantara seat inserts. Offering up to 59 cubic feet of cargo space (27.8 cubic feet with the rear seat up), the S4 Avant is not only fun to run errands in, but it’s also useful.

    Convenience and enjoyment are recurring themes inside the Avant with our test model being equipped with the optional ($1,950) navigation system and a Bose premium sound system with Sirius satellite radio. Changing and/or viewing stereo settings, navigation route guidance and system options are easy for the driver thanks to the dials mounted on the steering wheel and viewable in the instrument cluster digital display.

    Besides the seats and a slightly different instrument panel, the S4 Avant had an interior that was almost identical to the 2007 S4 Cabriolet we previously tested. Unfortunately, our main complaint about the Cabriolet’s interior was also present in the Avant. The placement of the parking brake lever under the height-adjustable center console made setting and releasing the parking brake feel awkward and unnatural. In a car with such a refined interior, it’s rather disappointing that such an obvious conflict of space is present.

    One glaring weak point in the otherwise flawless design of the A4/S4 line is its crash-test rating. Although receiving a good rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) gave the Avant and Sedan models a four-star rating for frontal-impact and rollover protection (side-impact crash tests resulted in a five-star rating for front passenger protection and four stars for rear passenger protection).

    As was the case with the S4 Cabriolet, drivers looking for the high-performance version of the A4 Avant need to come up with a considerable premium over the standard four-cylinder variant’s asking price. The base A4 Avant model starts at $32,000, while the S4 Avant and all its performance glory have a starting MSRP of $49,610. Toss in the all the option upgrades and the 2008 Audi S4 Avant we drove had an as-tested price of $57,310.

    Premises courtesy of Sunshine Dragstrip of Clearwater, Fla.


    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2009 Mitsubishi Galant Review | New Galant Reviews | Mitsubishi Sedan Review

    The Mitsubishi Galant is a four-door midsize sedan that sports a modestly updated design for 2009. While the Galant’s main draw has been its roomy cabin and efficient powertrain options, critics have lambasted the car for its docile design. With a full redesign still a couple more years away, the 2009 Galant receives a fresh, updated look. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2009 Mitsubishi Galant.

       


    In the automotive industry, midsize sedans are in one of the most hotly contested markets. Having to go up against cars like the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry and Chevrolet Malibu, competing manufacturers are forced to find a way to keep their cars relevant in a lopsided battle for top sales. Mitsubishi apparently decided to focus on more function than form when it came to its midsize entry.

    The 2009 Mitsubishi Galant is not going to win any speed awards or be a tech junkie’s dream come true, but Mitsubishi made sure its largest sedan offered top levels of comfort and efficiency wrapped in a simple, yet attractive design. Despite the last major redesign coming over five years ago, the Galant has survived this long thanks to a few minor design updates, and more of the same is in store for the Galant for the 2009 model year.

    The most noticeable difference on the 2009 Galant’s exterior is the rear end. New taillight, decklid and fascia treatments transform the posterior of the Galant from ho-hum to quite attractive. While some will point out that the lights mimic the Hyundai Sonata (which in turn mimics the Lexus IS), the look definitely fits the Galant and adds more character than the previous square taillight treatment. Up front, a modestly updated hood and fascia now provide a larger grille opening with thick chrome trim and lower faux air inlets that house the fog lamps. The blacked-out headlamps, optional 17-inch, five-spoke alloy wheels and dark, Maizen Blue monochromatic paint scheme exuded a surprisingly athletic stance for the Galant. 

    Inside is where the 2009 Galant truly excels. In addition to the upgraded sport fabric seats (featuring heated front seats), The black, marble-esque dash inserts were prone to smudging but did not detract from the clean interior. From the driver’s seat, three large gauges are easy to read, while the center stack flowed smoothly from the soft, rubbery upper instrument panel covering. The bright silver lower center stack that housed all radio and HVAC controls helped to break up the span of darkness that was the Galant’s interior. On lengthy road trips, the seats and center armrest provided exceptional levels of comfort.

    The one major complaint about the interior is the lack of a folding rear seat. The Galant’s trunk offers a relatively small capacity (13.3 cubic feet) in its class and if longer items are required, all that is available is a small pass-through behind the rear bench seat armrest.

    On the road, the Galant handles about as well as should be expected from an almost-base model. While more powerful V-6 options exist for the Galant, the Sport Edition model we tested came equipped with Mitsubishi’s 160-horsepower 2.4-liter MIVEC four cylinder. Another major downside of the 2009 Galant is the lack of a manual transmission option. Powering the front wheels on the ES and Sport Edition is a four-speed automatic, while the Sport V6 and Ralliart models get an extra gear – both transmissions feature a manual shift mode.

    The redesigned 2009 model has yet to be tested by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration or the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, but both gave the 2008 model top marks in both front- and side-impact protection. Standard safety features include advanced dual airbags, seat-mounted front side airbags, roof-mounted side-curtain airbags and daytime running lamps.

    For 2009, the Mitsubishi Galant comes with a base MSRP of $21,099. The model we tested came with the optional ($1,400) Sport Value Package and an as-tested price of $23,124. Making the deal even sweeter on the latest Galant are the standard five-year/60,000-mile basic warranty and 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty.

    2009 Mitsubishi Galant Pictures and Wallpapers

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2008 Volkswagen Touareg 2 Review | New Touareg Reviews | Volkswagen SUV Review

    It may be hard to pronounce, but Volkswagen’s Touareg 2 is easy on the eyes. Updated for 2008, the Touareg 2 now boasts a stylish exterior and a front-end treatment in line with other Volkswagen vehicles. With its tall ride height, short overhangs and powerful engine choices, VW has created an SUV that looks and performs just as well on road as it does off road. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2008 Volkswagen Touareg 2.

       


    Volkswagen took American motorists a bit off guard when it launched the Phaeton in 2003. While the car was stuffed with luxury and power comparable to a BMW 7 Series or Mercedes-Benz S-Class, few were ready to drop $60,000 on a Volkswagen at the time.

    The same year the Phaeton was introduced, Volkswagen followed the money trail and introduced its first SUV, the Touareg. Since then, VW has pulled the Phaeton luxury sedan from its North American lineup, making the Touareg the company’s flagship vehicle here in the States. To keep the Touareg fresh, Volkswagen went Hollywood on the Touareg giving it a much-needed facelift for 2008.

    The updated 2008 Touareg 2 kept the wide, stocky stance and short overhangs of the original, while the passive front-end treatment was abandoned for a more contemporary-Volkswagen design. In all, the Touareg 2 now adds an impressive design to its already beaming repertoire that include a luxurious interior and stellar off-road capabilities. Up front, a pair of Bi-Xenon, scalloped headlights flank VW’s signature oversized chrome grille, while the rear end gets some tinted taillights and dual, quad-tipped exhaust to enhance the sporty looks.
     
    Even at a standstill, the Touareg has always looked like a rugged SUV that would be more comfortable getting down and dirty in a big mud puddle than tooling down the highway. With a ride height of 8.3 inches, the Touareg 2 is able to tackle most off-road scenarios it encounters yet is still low enough that getting in or out should not pose a problem for average adults. One option we have loved to play with is the ($2,750) 4-corner air suspension system that allows the driver to manually adjust the Touareg’s ride height anywhere from a sleek 6.3 inches up to a rock-crawling 11.8 inches.

    When it came time for the refreshing, Volkswagen left the interior alone – and for good reason. The highly detailed interior of the Touareg 2 features a high-class fit and finish. Everything from the door panels to the seating surfaces to the radio and HVAC controls were stylish, well placed and soft to the touch. The soft leather used on the Touareg’s steering wheel, door trim panels, seats and armrests were only outdone by pleasant metallic control knobs that featured small rubber inlays that not only provided for better grip, but also for a better feeling during use.

    From the driver’s seat, the instrument cluster provided two large gauges for speedometer and tachometer flanking a small information screen, with four smaller gagues along the bottom edge of the cluster. Keyless start/stop made getting into the Touareg and starting it easy for the driver, while the 4-zone Climatronic system prevented A/C fights by providing all passengers their own individual controls. For rear passengers, the B-pillar mounted A/C vents provide better flow and optimal comfort.

    With accommodations for five, the Touareg 2 can hold up to 31 cubic feet of cargo or up to 71 cubic with the rear seat folded flat. If more cargo needs to be hauled, the Touareg can carry up to 220 pounds on the roof rack or 7,716 pounds on a trailer (when properly equipped with the trailer package). To be blunt, this is no cute-ute or soft-roader.

    Aside from the numerous convenient, luxurious touches, our one main gripe about the interior was the lack of a navigation system (included in a $3,350 package). On a vehicle nipping at $50,000, one would think that VW’s useful navigation system could somehow find its way into the center stack. Since this Touareg was not equipped with the navigation system, we weren’t able to test out the rear view back up camera, but fortunately Volkswagen equipped the Touareg 2 with its Park Distance Control system as standard equipment. With four sensors mounted on the front and rear bumpers each, small sets of indicator lights progressively illuminate inside the vehicle and an audible noise alert the driver when an object is detected in front of or behind the vehicle.

    The Touareg 2, along with its close cousins the Porsche Cayenne and Audi Q7, offer one of the most unique and powerful engine lineups to any other SUVs. The Touareg 2 we tested came with Volkswagen’s modest and mild-mannered 280-horsepower, 3.6-liter VR6, which was more than adequate in any daily driving. Still, after driving two Audi S4 offerings recently, we couldn’t help but wonder how much fun the 350-horsepower V-8 would be or, even better, the diesel torque-monster that is the 5.0-liter V-10 TDI capable 310 horsepower and a whopping 553 lb-ft of torque – maybe some other day!

    Despite a design and aerodynamic shape that was unmistakably Volkswagen, the new Touareg 2’s un-svelte 5,086-pound curb weight gave it some un-Volkswagen-like low EPA fuel economy estimates of 14 mpg city and 19 mpg highway. Despite such low numbers, the 2008 Touareg 2 saw fuel economy that wasn’t too far off from other crossovers we’ve tested recently - such as the 2008 Suzuki XL7 (16/22) and the 2007 Hyundai Veracruz (17/24).

    With a starting MSRP of $39,420, the Touareg 2 should please just about anyone looking for a capable, real world SUV with a no-haggle drivetrain and luxurious interior. Handsomely equipped, however, the $46,300 Touareg 2 we tested may chase more than a few VW costumers away. For those people, Volkswagen will be introducing a minivan (2009 Routan), station wagon (2009 Jetta SportWagen) and compact crossover (2009 Tiguan) throughout the year.

    2008 Volkswagen Touareg 2 Pictures and Wallpapers

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

  • 2007 Audi S4 Cabriolet Review | New S4 Reviews | Audi Convertible Review

    The Audi S4 Cabriolet is a performance-minded vehicle that also offers the enjoyment of top down driving. With its high-horsepower engine and sport-tuned suspension, the S4 Cabriolet feels like a car meant for race days, but with the look and attitude perfect for a Friday night out on the town. Keep reading below for a full review on the 2007 Audi S4 Cabriolet.

       


    With all the topless cars we’ve been featuring lately, we could probably rename the column Cars Gone Wild. From the small and sporty Mazda MX-5 to the spacious and luxurious Volkswagen Eos, our recent reviews of drop tops have offered completely varying experiences.

    Up next, a convertible bred for the Autobahn offering a luxurious interior and stuffed with a powerful V-8 - the Audi S4 Cabriolet.

    The 2007 Audi S4 Cabriolet is a perfect example of what happens when a manufacturer lets its performance technology trickle down to everyday models. Building off Audi’s success in various levels of automotive racing, Audi has created competent rivals to BMW’s M vehicles and Mercedes-Benz’s AMG vehicles with their own performance brand, the S- and RS-line. Upon applying the S-line performance enhancements to the mild-mannered A4, Audi had a car that performs even better than it looks.

    From a mere performance standpoint, the S4 feels like a pure sports car. Powering the S4 Cabriolet is a 4.2-liter DOHC V-8 that produces 340 horsepower and 302 lb-ft of torque. Upon acceleration, the S4 roars up to its 7,000-rpm redline where it finds its peak horsepower as the quad chrome-tipped dual exhaust belts out an enjoyable, yet aggressive, note. The S4’s sport-tuned suspension provides stiffer shocks and stronger stabilizers for increased handling and cornering, while Audi’s famed quattro® permanent all-wheel drive system helps to keep all that power under control.

    Running from 0-60 mph in the mid five second range, the S4 is a quick and agile vehicle. Although Audi’s six-speed Tiptronic transmission is available for duty, we’re glad the car we tested was equipped with the six-speed manual transmission that provided smooth, effortless and precise shifting. While “cowl shake” and “body roll” are commonly associated with convertibles, the S4 is both solid and steady whether it’s being taken over bumpy roads or driven hard into tight corners.

    Visually, the S4 Cabriolet varies little from the basic A4’s already stunning looks. Apart from the athletic stance that is 30 mm lower than a stock A4, Audi limited the S4’s exterior upgrades to keep the car’s clean, stylish look in tact. In addition to the S4-specific front calipers peering out from behind the 18-inch, seven twin-spoke alloy wheels, S4 badges grace the decklid and Audi’s trademark grille, while small “V8” badges under the side marker lights reaffirm what rests under the hood.

    While most soft-top convertibles have a less inspiring design than their steel-topped counterparts do, the S4 Cabriolet offers a very attractive profile. The roofline has a slight upward curve that not only improves the S4 visually, but it also adds an increased sense of interior space.

    Inside, the bright red leather interior features black stitching and beautifully complements our S4’s Ibis White exterior, while carbon fiber accents adorn the instrument panel, center console and door trim. From the driver’s seat, all of the controls are easy to reach and to operate. A large tachometer and speedometer flank the digital information system, while smaller temperature and fuel level gauges finish off the instrument cluster. The S4-specific tachometer bumps the redline from 6,500, on the regular A4 models, up to 7,000, which the ferocious V-8 isn’t afraid to hit.

    Our only complaints about the S4 Cabriolet’s interior are the awkward placement of the parking brake lever and speed control stalk. The armrest itself is quite useful providing a small amount of storage and is height adjustable. Unfortunately, when it comes time to park, the armrest gets in the way of the parking brake lever making the motion of setting the parking brake not as fluid as one would expect. As for the speed control stalk, first timers may find a bit of a challenge in operating the speed control due to the stalk being located directly behind the left spoke of the steering wheel (when the wheel is straight). Once accustomed to the positions of the various buttons, the cruise control is easy to engage with the left hand.

    Cruising with the top down is the only reason to buy a convertible in the first place, and the S4 transforms from a quiet coupe to open-air luxury in just 24 seconds. With the top up, the S4 Cabriolet is surprisingly quiet - sounding almost as quiet as its solid-topped brethren. Even dropping the top on a nice sunny day won’t result in the necessity for blaring the optional Bose radio or loss of conversation. At highway speeds, there is no problem holding a conversation without yelling or hearing a moderately tuned radio especially with the windows up and, even better, with the removable wind deflector in place over the rear seats.

    Despite the fact that many manufacturers are switching to retractable hardtops, the A4 Cabriolet lineup continues to use a cloth top. Ample headroom is available for both front- and rear-seat passengers, although the long-legged passengers may want to avoid the rear seats. Up front, passengers get up to 37.8 inches of headroom and 41.3 inches of legroom; in back, headroom drops to 36.3 inches, while legroom shrinks to just 32.4 inches.

    Being a performance car with a heavy price tag, anyone in the market for an Audi S4 Cabriolet should not be squeamish when it comes time to fill ‘er up. The lovely, rev-happy, powerful aforementioned V-8 gets has an EPA rating of just 14 mpg city and 21 mpg highway. Running on premium unleaded only, it’s not exactly cheap to fill the 16.6-gallon fuel tank.
     
    The performance and luxury attributes of the S4 Cabriolet don’t come cheap. The 2007 S4 we tested had a starting MSRP of $55,700 and came with a laundry list of optional features and a $1,700 gas-guzzler tax for an as-tested price of $64,100.

    2007 Audi S4 Cabriolet Pictures and Wallpapers

    Review written by: Jeffrey N. Ross
    All photos copyright Jeffrey N. Ross/Autotropolis.com © 2008

More Posts Next page »

This Blog

Syndication

Tags

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems